Management of rectal injury during radical prostatectomy: Our experience and literature review

Authors

  • Anna Sánchez-Llopis Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, Castellón, España
  • Marc Blanco-Silvestre Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, Castellón, España
  • Guillem Abad-Carratalá Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, Castellón, España
  • Pedro Martínez-Meneu Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, Castellón, España
  • Rosa Monsonís-Usó Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, Castellón, España
  • Laura Barrios-Arnau Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, Castellón, España
  • Paula Ponce-Blasco Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, Castellón, España
  • Carmen Garau-Perelló Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, Castellón, España
  • Carlos Di Capua-Sacoto Hospital Universitari de la Plana, Villareal, España
  • Miguel Rodrigo-Aliaga Hospital General Universitari de Castelló, Castellón, España

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48193/revistamexicanadeurologa.v82i2.842

Keywords:

Rectal injury, prostatectomy, treatment

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the incidence, possible risk factors and management of rectal injury during radical prostatectomy.

Design, methodology or approach: Rectal injury is a rare but potentially serious complication of radical prostatectomy (RP). Current evidence is limited as most studies are based on relatively small series.

A total of 147 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were retrospectively reviewed from January 2017 to April 2021. Four patients with rectal injury were found during the procedure.

Results: Of the total number of patients with rectal injury during the procedure, there was extraprostatic extension in the pre-surgery MRI in 50% of the patients. None had a history of previous RT. Primary closure was performed using two layers of suture in all cases. In one case (25%) an intraoperative colostomy was performed. One of the four patients (25%) developed a rectal fistula with secondary peritonitis for which he had to undergo another operation. The time on absolute diet varied from 0 days to 2 days and the time of antibiotic therapy differed in all patients.

Discussion: Rectal injury occurs in 0.1-1.8% of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and significantly increases the morbidity of the procedure. Most rectal injuries occur during plane dissection maneuvers between the seminal vesicles, prostate, and rectum. To detect it, it is recommended to perform a digital rectal examination and insufflate air through the rectum intraoperatively. The risk factors for its appearance are previous RT, an advanced tumor and a low experience of the surgeon in the procedure. The interposition of tissue in rectal defects continues to generate controversy. Despite primary closure, there is a risk of rectal fistula, especially in cases of defects larger than 2 cm, previous RT, or tumor infiltration of the rectum.

Conclusions: Rectal injury is a rare but serious complication that can complicate the postoperative period of radical prostatectomy.

References

European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines Annual Congress Amsterdam. In Amsterdam: EAU Pocket Guidelines; 2020.

Hoznek A, Salomon L, Olsson LE, Antiphon P, Saint F, Cicco A, et al. Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. EUR. 2001;40(1):38–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000049747

Türk I, Deger S, Winkelmann B, Schönberger B, Loening SA. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Technical aspects and experience with 125 cases. Eur Urol. 2001;40(1):46–52; discussion 53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000049748

Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. Journal of Urology. 2001;166(6):2101–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65514-0

Bollens R, Bossche MV, Roumeguere T, Damoun A, Ekane S, Hoffmann P, et al. Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. EUR. 2001;40(1):65–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000049750

Gill IS, Zippe CD. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: technique. Urologic Clinics of North America. 2001;28(2):423–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70150-6

Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the montsouris experience. Journal of Urology. 2000;163(2):418–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67890-1

Mandel P, Linnemannstöns A, Chun F, Schlomm T, Pompe R, Budäus L, et al. Incidence, Risk Factors, Management, and Complications of Rectal Injuries During Radical Prostatectomy. European Urology Focus. 2018;4(4):554–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2017.01.008

Rabbani F, Yunis LH, Pinochet R, Nogueira L, Vora KC, Eastham JA, et al. Comprehensive Standardized Report of Complications of Retropubic and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. European Urology. 2010;57(3):371–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.11.034

Hung C-F, Yang C-K, Cheng C-L, Ou Y-C. Bowel complication during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Anticancer Res. 2011;31(10):3497–501.

Borland RN, Walsh PC. The Management of Rectal Injury During Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy. Journal of Urology. 1992;147(3 Part 2):905–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37418-9

Coelho RF, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Moniz RR, Chauhan S, Orvieto MA, et al. Early Complication Rates in a Single-Surgeon Series of 2500 Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomies: Report Applying a Standardized Grading System. European Urology. 2010;57(6):945–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.001

Kheterpal E, Bhandari A, Siddiqui S, Pokala N, Peabody J, Menon M. Management of Rectal Injury During Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. Urology. 2011;77(4):976–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.11.045

Wedmid A, Mendoza P, Sharma S, Hastings RL, Monahan KP, Walicki M, et al. Rectal Injury During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Incidence and Management. Journal of Urology. 2011;186(5):1928–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.004

Lepor H, Nieder AM, Ferrandino MN. Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1729–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65662-5

McLaren RH, Barrett DM, Zincke H. Rectal injury occurring at radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer: etiology and treatment. Urology. 1993;42(4):401–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-4295(93)90366-I

Guillonneau B, Gupta R, El FH, Cathelineau X, Baumert H, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic Management Of Rectal Injury During Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of Urology. 2003;169(5):1694–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000059860.00022.07

Shekarriz B, Upadhyay J, Wood DP. Intraoperative, perioperative, and long-term complications of radical prostatectomy. Urologic Clinics of North America. 2001;28(3):639–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70168-3

Häggman M, Brändstedt S, Norlen BJ. Rectal Perforation after Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: Occurrence and Management. EUR. 1996; 29:337–40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000473772

Yıldırım M, Göktaş C, Horuz R, Cetinel CA, Cangüven O, Küçük HF, et al. Rectal injury during radical prostatectomy. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2012 May;18(3):250–4. doi: https://doi.org/10.5505/tjtes.2012.04379

Katz R, Borkowski T, Hoznek A, Salomon L, Taille A de la, Abbou CC. Operative management of rectal injuries during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2003;62(2):310–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00326-1

Castillo OA, Bodden E, Vitagliano G. Management of rectal injury during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int braz j urol. 2006;32:428–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382006000400007

Roberts WB, Tseng K, Walsh PC, Han M. Critical appraisal of management of rectal injury during radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2010;76(5):1088–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.03.054

Gotto GT, Yunis LH, Vora K, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Rabbani F. Impact of Prior Prostate Radiation on Complications After Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of Urology. 2010;184(1):136–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.031

Schmitges J, Trinh Q-D, Sun M, Abdollah F, Bianchi M, Budäus L, et al. Annual Prostatectomy Volume Is Related to Rectal Laceration Rate After Radical Prostatectomy. Urology. 2012;79(4):796–803. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.061

Ellimoottil C, Roghmann F, Blackwell R, Kadlec A, Greco K, Quek ML, et al. Open Versus Robotic Radical Prostatectomy in Obese Men. Current Urology. 2015;8(3):156–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1159/000365708

Hinman F Jr. Total retropubicprostatectomy. In: Atlas of Urologic Surgery. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1998. p. 431-445.

Published

2022-05-11

Issue

Section

Review articles