Differences in the complications according to the approach and type of nephrectomy in renal cancer CT1 treated with surgery
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48193/revistamexicanadeurologa.v81i2.695Keywords:
nephrectomy, laparoscopic, complicationsAbstract
Objective: Comparative analysis of postoperative complications according to approach (open and laparoscopic) and surgical technique (radical and partial nephrectomy) in patients with renal cancer c T1.
Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of 480 patients with renal cancer c T1 treated by surgery between 1990-2010. Complications in the first 60 days after surgery were evaluated (Clavien-Dindo classification).Complications Clavien≥III were severe.
Patients was clasificated in four cohort: 1) Open radical nephrectomy (ORN);2) laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) ;3) open partial nephrectomy (OPN) ; 4) laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).
Univariate and multivariate analysis have been performed using Cox regression to determine variables with relate to the complications.
Results: In 198(41,3%) patients was performed ORN and in 155(32,3%)LRN. In the group of partial nephrectomies, 51 cases (10.6%) were open and 76 (15.8%) laparoscopic.
Complications occurred in 20.2% of patients. The most frequent was Clavien II (13%). 25,8% undergoing ORN developed complications, in the LRN group 16,8% experienced complications (p=0,09). No significant difference in distribution of complications between laparoscopic and open approach in partial nephrectomy (OPN-15,7%, LPN-15,8%)
The group of ORN had more complications than the other groups (of type Clavien-II), but there were not differences between severe complications.
In the multivariable analysis laparoscopic radical nephrectomy behaved as independent predictive variable of complications (OR=0,41, p=0,007). In the multivariable analysis of Clavien≥III complication, no predictor or protective factor was identified.
Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy decreased the total postoperative complications to more than half. In severe complications (Clavien ≥ III) no predictors of complications were identified.
References
Ljungberg B, Albiges L, Abu-Ghanem Y, Bensalah K, Dabestani S, Fernández-Pello S, et al. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma: The 2019 Update. Eur Urol. 2019 May;75(5):799–810. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.011
Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1991 Aug;146(2):278–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)37770-4
Dunn MD, Portis AJ, Shalhav AL, Elbahnasy AM, Heidorn C, McDougall EM, et al. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy: a 9-year experience. J Urol. 2000 Oct;164(4):1153–9. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2017.03.004
Ono Y, Kinukawa T, Hattori R, Yamada S, Nishiyama N, Mizutani K, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a five-year experience. Urology. 1999 Feb;53(2):280–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00505-6
Barrett PH, Fentie DD, Taranger LA. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with morcellation for renal cell carcinoma: the Saskatoon experience. Urology. 1998 Jul;52(1):23–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00159-9
Hemal AK, Kumar A, Kumar R, Wadhwa P, Seth A, Gupta NP. Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison. J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):862–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.053
Gratzke C, Seitz M, Bayrle F, Schlenker B, Bastian PJ, Haseke N, et al. Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int. 2009 Aug;104(4):470–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.2009.08439.x
1. Patard J-J, Shvarts O, Lam JS, Pantuck AJ, Kim HL, Ficarra V, et al. Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience. J Urol. 2004 Jun;171(6 Pt 1):2181–5, quiz 2435. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000124846.37299.5e
Deklaj T, Lifshitz DA, Shikanov SA, Katz MH, Zorn KC, Shalhav AL. Laparoscopic radical versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1bN0M0 renal tumors: comparison of perioperative, pathological, and functional outcomes. J Endourol. 2010 Oct;24(10):1603–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2009.0312
Capitanio Umberto, Terrone Carlo, Antonelli Alessandro, Minervini Andrea, Fiori Cristian, Zegna Luisa, et al. Mp44-04 nephron-sparing surgery protects from chronic kidney disease relative to radical nephrectomy but does not impact on other-causes mortality: long-term (more than 10 years) survival and functional outcomes in patients with a t1a-t1b renal mass. Journal of Urology. 2015 Apr 1;193(4S):e527–e527. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.02.1546
Gershman B, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Lohse CM, Costello BA, Cheville JC, et al. Radical Versus Partial Nephrectomy for cT1 Renal Cell Carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):825–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.028
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae
Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Chichester, West Sussex, UK ; Hoboken, NJ; 2009. 336 p.
Kutikov A, Uzzo RG. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol. 2009 Sep;182(3):844–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.05.035
Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, Macchi V, Porzionato A, De Caro R, et al. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009 Nov;56(5):786–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.040
Simmons MN, Ching CB, Samplaski MK, Park CH, Gill IS. Kidney tumor location measurement using the C index method. J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1708–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.01.005
Herr HW. A history of partial nephrectomy for renal tumors. J Urol. 2005 Mar;173(3):705–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000146270.65101.1d
Herr HW. Surgical management of renal tumors: a historical perspective. Urol Clin North Am. 2008 Nov;35(4):543–9; v. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ucl.2008.07.010
McDougall EM, Clayman RV, Chandhoke PS, Kerbl K, Stone AM, Wick MR, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in the pig model. J Urol. 1993 Jun;149(6):1633–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36465-0
Winfield HN, Donovan JF, Godet AS, Clayman RV. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: initial case report for benign disease. J Endourol. 1993 Dec;7(6):521–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.1993.7.521
Zini L, Perrotte P, Capitanio U, Jeldres C, Shariat SF, Antebi E, et al. Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality. Cancer. 2009 Apr 1;115(7):1465–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24035
Thompson R. Houston, Boorjian Stephen A., Lohse Christine M., Leibovich Bradley C., Kwon Eugene D., Cheville John C., et al. Radical Nephrectomy for pT1a Renal Masses May be Associated With Decreased Overall Survival Compared With Partial Nephrectomy. J Urol. 2008 Feb 1;179(2):468–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.077
Hernández C, Escribano G, Díez Cordero JM, Verdú F, Palacio A, Jara J. Nefrectomía laparoscópica por vía retroperitoneal. Caso report. Actas Urol Esp. 1994;18: 619-622
Becker A, Ravi P, Roghmann F, Trinh Q-D, Tian Z, Larouche A, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy vs laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell carcinoma: comparison of complication rates in elderly patients during the initial phase of adoption. Urology. 2014 Jun;83(6):1285–91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.01.050
An JY, Ball MW, Gorin MA, Hong JJ, Johnson MH, Pavlovich CP, et al. Partial vs Radical Nephrectomy for T1-T2 Renal Masses in the Elderly: Comparison of Complications, Renal Function, and Oncologic Outcomes. Urology. 2017 Feb;100:151–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.10.047
Pereira J, Renzulli J, Pareek G, Moreira D, Guo R, Zhang Z, et al. Perioperative Morbidity of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy: A Contemporary Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Endourol. 2018 Feb;32(2):116–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0609
Yang C, Wang Z, Huang S, Xue L, Fu D, Chong T. Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Hilar Tumor: Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics and Short-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1183–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0064
Mir MC, Derweesh I, Porpiglia F, Zargar H, Mottrie A, Autorino R. Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1b and T2 Renal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies. Eur Urol. 2017 Apr;71(4):606–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.08.060
Hadjipavlou M, Khan F, Fowler S, Joyce A, Keeley FX, Sriprasad S, et al. Partial vs radical nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: an analysis from the British Association of Urological Surgeons Nephrectomy Audit. BJU Int. 2016 Jan;117(1):62–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.13114
Marszalek M, Meixl H, Polajnar M, Rauchenwald M, Jeschke K, Madersbacher S. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1171–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.042
Gill IS, Kamoi K, Aron M, Desai MM. 800 Laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon series. J Urol. 2010 Jan;183(1):34–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.08.114
