PET-CT 18F-PSMA 1007 in the staging of patients with prostate cancer prior to curative intent radiotherapy: a prospective observational study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48193/pzbbwq92Keywords:
Prostate cancer, PSMA, PET-CT, tomographyAbstract
Objective: The objective of our study was to assess whether there are staging changes in CaP with PET PSMA compared to standard diagnostic methods, and if these changes occurred, to understand how they altered the treatment of patients with an initial diagnosis of CaP and their relationship with the D'amico score.
Methods: We present a prospective observational study conducted on patients initially diagnosed with prostate cancer, who underwent standard staging studies alongside PET PSMA imaging.
Results: Forty patients diagnosed with prostate cancer were staged using standard diagnostic methods and PET PSMA. In 40% of the patients, initial staging changed based on the results obtained from PET PSMA. After PET PSMA, the uro-oncology committee decided to modify the initial treatment plan in 27.5% of the cases, including radiation boost targeting the extra-prostatic lesions detected by PET PSMA. When correlating the change in staging with PET PSMA versus the D'amico risk score, no changes were observed in the low-risk group, 19% in the intermediate-risk group, and 62% in the high-risk group. These differences were statistically significant (X2=9.2; df=2; p=0.01).
Limitation and value: The study faced limitations in sample size and lack of long-term patient follow-up. However, it highlights key contributions: the promising evaluation of PET PSMA in staging, its influence on therapeutic decisions, and its association with the D'amico score.
Conclusion: PET PSMA showed substantial changes in CaP staging, particularly in higher-risk patients, suggesting its potential utility in guiding therapeutic decisions before radiotherapy.
References
Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65(2): 87–108. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262.
Culp MB, Soerjomataram I, Efstathiou JA, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Global Patterns in Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality Rates. European Urology. 2020;77(1): 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.005.
Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Francis RJ, Tang C, Vela I, Thomas P, et al. Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in patients with high-risk prostate cancer before curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA): a prospective, randomised, multicentre study. The Lancet. 2020;395(10231): 1208–1216. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30314-7.
Schwarzenboeck SM, Rauscher I, Bluemel C, Fendler WP, Rowe SP, Pomper MG, et al. PSMA Ligands for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine. 2017;58(10): 1545–1552. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.191031.
D’Amico AV. Biochemical Outcome After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiation Therapy, or Interstitial Radiation Therapy for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. JAMA. 1998;280(11): 969. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.11.969.
Van Kalmthout LWM, Van Melick HHE, Lavalaye J, Meijer RP, Kooistra A, De Klerk JMH, et al. Prospective Validation of Gallium-68 Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer. Journal of Urology. 2020;203(3): 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000000531.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Mexicana de Urología
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.